The Eduard Mig-21
“Fishbed” has seen many incarnations in 48th scale – and just like
the real thing these aircraft are not all the same as each other. Gary shows us
how many of the parts of this - the "ambush" version of the Fishbed - the “PFM” Mig-21, differs from the others already
released by Eduard in today’s review…
Kit No: 8237
1/48 scale
Plastic Sprues: 7
Clear Sprues: 1
Photo Etch Brass Fret: 2
Decal Sheet: 2
Available from Eduard Directly
Eduard continues to steadily expand its family of MiG-21 kits in 1/48. This time around we review the PFM variant as used by the North Vietnamese, Czech, USSR, Egyptian and Polish air forces from the ‘60s to the 1990s. I’ve built the MiG-21MF kit from Eduard (in the funky Bunny scheme here) and can tell you the fit of these kits is every bit as good as how they look in the box.
The Aircraft
The Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 (Russian: Микоян и Гуревич
МиГ-21; NATO reporting name: Fishbed) is a supersonic jet fighter aircraft,
designed by the Mikoyan-Gurevich Design Bureau in the Soviet Union. It was
popularly nicknamed "Balalaika", from the aircraft's planform-view
resemblance to the Russian stringed musical instrument or ołówek (English:
pencil) by Polish pilots due to the shape of its fuselage.
Early versions are considered second-generation jet fighters,
while later versions are considered to be third-generation jet fighters.
Approximately 60 countries over four continents have flown the MiG-21, and it
still serves many nations a half-century after its maiden flight. The fighter
made aviation records. At least by name, it is the most-produced supersonic jet
aircraft in aviation history and the most-produced combat aircraft since the
Korean War, and it had the longest production run of a combat aircraft (1959 to
1985 over all variants)
The MiG-21PFM (1964; Izdeliye 94) with NATO reporting name
of "Fishbed-F" was a modernised MiG-21PF, with an upgraded RP-21M
radar, SRZO-2 Khrom-Nikkel IFF transponder and other changes in avionics.
Further, later-production PFMs reintroduced cannon armament, in the form of the
capability to carry a GSh-23 cannon and 200 rounds in an underbelly pod.
Following tests in 1966, MiG-21PFM aircraft built after 1968 could carry the
Kh-66 air-to-surface missile. The PFM also introduced a conventional cockpit
enclosure, with fixed windscreen plus side-opening canopy in place of the
earlier PF models’ single-piece front-hinged unit.
P = Perekhvatchik ("Interceptor")
F = Forsirovannyy ("Uprated")
M = Modernizirovannyy ("Modernised")
(source: www.wikipedia.org)
The Kit
With each new release Eduard are moving backward along the
MiG-21 evolution timeline. From their initial “Generation 3” kit releases (MF,
BIS and SMT variants) Eduard have more recently released “Generation 2”
airframes in the form of PFM and most recently the R variant.
The upshot of this is that many of the weapons provided on
the kit sprues are suitable only for the more modern MiG-21s. As you can see
from the sprue layout diagram, many of the parts are not relevant to the PFM
(those shaded in blue).
Sprue M contains the main fuselage halves, the forward and
rear airbrakes and two R-3S (AA-2 Atoll) missiles.
The rear airbrake can be displayed in the open or closed
position. Eduard have kindly provide two parts depending on which option you
choose. One has the airbrake closed and the other the brake itself is provided
as a separate part. This is an excellent touch as it makes the decision to
close the brake a lot less troublesome.
The kit comes with the forward airbrakes moulded in the
closed position. If you wish to display them open you need to cut open the
fuselage and use parts M7 & M6 as the interior of the brakes. This is
actually fairly tricky and my advice is to proceed carefully if you take this
option.
Once you have opened up the holes for the airbrakes you can
use parts M10 & M5 for the
brakes themselves.
The R-3S is very nicely moulded and not surprisingly looks a
lot like a Sidewinder (from which it was copied by the Russians)
Sprue L contains
the upper and lower wing parts. The Eduard MiG-21’s come with separate flaps
and ailerons. The all moving horizontal tails are also provided on this sprue
as is the ventral fin and rudder.
To highlight the very fine surface detail on this kit I have
taken some high contrast photos. The sharpness of the panel lines and rivets is
as good as any Tamiya kit I have seen. That’s about as good a compliment as you
can give a model.
Sprue N contains
parts for the tail and spine, the GS-9 gun pod, several cockpit parts
(including some instrument panel options and front shroud) and nozzles for the
SPRD-99 RATO pods. Most of the fins for the assorted missiles are also present
on this sprue. Pylons and assorted antennae fill out the remainder of the
available space.
This review kit is a ProfiPack edition. This typically means
the inclusion of a small photo-etch fret, pre-cut mask and loads of decal
options. In the event you do not wish to use the provided PE parts for the
cockpit IP and side consoles (some folks don’t like working with PE much) you
can build the cockpit with just plastic (as will eventually be released in the
Weekend Edition which do not come with any of the bells and whistles, or the
price tag, of the ProfiPack)
Part N9 (left) is
for those that do not wish to use the pre-painted PE parts. To save you some
time when using the optional Photo-Etch IP part
N8 (right) is provided and is totally flat and ready for the PE to be
simply glued into place.
The MiG-21PFM was not equipped with an internal gun,
although it was possible to mount a GP-9 gun pod on the centreline pylon in
place of the external fuel tank. Such a fit significantly reduced the fighters
range, however the North Vietnamese PFM’s were not delivered with the correct
wiring to allow the GP-9 pod to be fitted, although this technical oversight
was subsequently corrected. (source: MiG-21 Units of the Vietnam War, Osprey
Combat Aircraft #29)
The GP-9 pod houses a twin-barrelled 23mm GSh-23 cannon and
200 rounds of ammunition
The GSh-23 works on the Gast Gun principle developed
by German engineer Karl Gast
of the Vorwerk company in 1916. It is a twin-barrelled weapon in which the
firing action of one barrel operates the mechanism of the other. It provides a
much faster rate of fire for lower mechanical wear than a single-barrel weapon,
although it cannot match the rate of fire of an electric Gatling gun like the
M61 Vulcan. The Gast principle has been little used in the West, but was
popular in the former Soviet Union on a variety of weapons. (source:
www.wikipedia.org)
The front cockpit shroud is fairly basic in plastic. You can
either spruce this up with some basic scratch-building or purchase the optional
Brassin resin set designed specifically for this kit.
The SPRD-99 was a RATO system developed for the MiG-21 and
first introduced with the PFM. The bottles were mounted on the MiG-21’s lower
rear fuselage, one on each side. They shortened the MiG-21’s take-off run from
2727’ to 834’. Each SPRD-99 provided 5508lbs of thrust. The bottles burned for
about six seconds and dropped off the plane once it was airborne. They were not
reusable.
A useful period photo of a Soviet MiG-21 with a SPRD-99
fixed to the fuselage just behind the main wheel well. Also note the R-3S IR
(AA-2 ATOLL) missile attached to the wing pylon and finally the PTB-490 fuel
tank attached to the aircraft centreline pylon. This would have been a very
common lead-out over the skies of Vietnam as all kills by North Vietnamese
pilots where with the R-3S missile.
A graphic photo of a Czech MiG-21 struggling to maintain
control on take-off with the forces being applied by the RATO packs.
Sprue C contains
most of the fuselage interior components including the cockpit floor, cockpit
bulkheads and cockpit side consoles, the main and nose undercarriage bays and
exhaust tube.
Sprue E (x2) is
dedicated to stores and includes weapons and drop tanks. The bodies of the
SPRD-99 RATO bottles are also contained on this sprue.
The bulk of these sprues are not for use in this version of
the MiG-21 so you will end up with quite a few spares.
The weapons designed for use on the real PFM were fairly
limited. Remember that this aircraft was designed to be an all-weather interceptor
and if needed dog fighter (relying primarily on missiles as the PFM had no
internal gun). The primary weapons were therefore air-to-air missiles, namely
the R-3 (NATO reporting name AA-2A 'Atoll'.) which is similar in appearance and
function to the American AIM-9 Sidewinder from which it was reverse-engineered.
The North Vietnamese used the AA-2 missiles to good effect during the Vietnam
war scoring kills against both US F-4 Phantoms and F-105’s.
The RS-2US (aka K-5MS, NATO reporting name AA-1 'Alkali') was a beam-riding AAM.
The difficulties associated with beam-riding guidance, particularly in a
single-seat fighter aircraft, were substantial, making the 'Alkali' primarily a
short-range anti-bomber missile. Around 1967 the RS-2 was replaced by the K-55 (R-55 in service), which replaced
the beam-riding seeker with the semi-active radar homing or infrared seekers of
the R-3 (AA-2 'Atoll').
The S-24 is an
un-guided rocket weapon designed and used by the Soviet Air Force. It remains
in use by the Russian Air Force today. The name is based on the diameter of the
rocket, 240 mm (9.45 in).The Soviet Union was an early, enthusiastic user of rocket
weapons, employing them as early as the 1930s. The S-24B is 2.33 meters (7 ft 8
in) long, with a launch weight of 235 kg (518 lb). It has a 123 kg (271 lb)
blast-fragmentation warhead. Its range is about 2-3 kilometers (1.3 - 1.8
miles). The S-24B is carried individually on weapon pylons, rather than in
pods.
All versions of the MiG-21 have a ‘wet’ centreline pylon
permitting carriage of a 490-litre (107.8 Imp. gal.) The PTB-490 drop tank is
of circular cross-section with a pointed nose and cruciform fins. The tank
weighs 70 kg (154 lb) empty and 470 kg (1,036 lb) full. The MiG-21PFM was not
capable of carrying fuel tanks on the wings as wet wing pylons were not
introduced until the MiG-21R.
Sprue D contains
most of the small parts across the entire airframe. A mixture of wheel hubs,
tires, main and nose landing gear struts, gear doors, refuelling probe, nose
cone, exhaust nozzle and all parts for the KM-1 ejection seat.
The kit provides wheels and tires which are separately moulded.
This makes the painting a much easier task as it relives us of the task of
masking.
Sprue G is the
clear sprue. It includes multiple canopies as used across most Generation 2/3
MiG-21 variants, windshields and clear instrument panels (for those who like
this option)
Paint Schemes and
Decals
Being a ProfiPack release this kit offers a substantial
number of marking options. Five schemes in total are included covering North
Vietnam, Czech, Egypt, Poland and of course the USSR. As with all previous
Eduard MiG-21 kits a separate decal sheet containing over 100 stencils is
provided (ouch!!)
I noticed recently that a Weekend Edition of this model has
now been released with a single decal option that being the Polish one.
As usual the Eduard kit decals are of a high quality being
thin and in register. I used the kit decals on my previous Eduard MiG-21 build
and can confirm that they respond well to most setting solutions and conform
exceptionally well to panel and rivet detail on the model surface.
The stencils provided with these kits are extensive and will
occupy a large amount of your time in the decaling phase.
Eduard continues to provide us with interesting MiG-21
subjects and along the way they are getting every bit of use out of the
engineering investment they made in the original tooling. I don’t expect that
many modellers will desire to build every variant of the MiG-21 but if you have
a particular favorite you can pretty much be assured that given time Eduard
will satisfy you with a kit of it, and what a kit it is. These models are works
of art in their fit, accuracy and attention to detail.
I hope that the Eduard exploration of the MiG-21 family
continues further into the earlier Generation 2 variants and we see a PF or
earlier airframe (those with the front hinged canopies). This would require a
fair amount of tooling changes and may not be cost effective but it does not
stop us from hoping.
Highly Recommended.
Gary Wickham
Thanks very much to Eduard for
the review kit.